Wrongful Termination and California’s Non-Compete Agreements

The relationship between employers and employees in California is governed by a complex web of laws designed to protect both parties’ interests. Among these, the concept of wrongful termination plays a crucial role, ensuring that employees are not unfairly dismissed from their positions. Another significant area of employment law in California involves non-compete agreements, which often come into play during and after the termination of employment. Understanding the interplay between wrongful termination and non-compete agreements is essential for both employers and employees in the state. In this comprehensive discussion, we will explore the legal landscape of wrongful termination, delve into the specifics of non-compete agreements in California, and examine how these two areas intersect in the realm of employment law.

David P. Myers

Managing Partner

Adam N. Stern

Attorney

Ann Hendrix

Attorney

Robert Kitson

Attorney

Justin Crane

Attorney

Doug Smith

Attorney

Jason Hatcher

Attorney

Morgan J. Good

Attorney

Alvin Ferrara

Attorney

Understanding Wrongful Termination in California

Wrongful termination occurs when an employee is dismissed from their job in violation of legal or contractual obligations. In California, the majority of employment relationships are considered “at-will,” meaning that either the employer or the employee can terminate the employment at any time, with or without cause, and with or without notice. However, even in an at-will employment relationship, certain terminations are deemed wrongful under California law. These include terminations that violate public policy, breach an implied contract, or are discriminatory in nature.

Terminations that violate public policy are those that contravene fundamental principles or statutory obligations. For example, an employee cannot be terminated for refusing to engage in illegal activities, reporting workplace safety violations, or exercising their rights under the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) or the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). Discriminatory terminations occur when an employee is fired based on a protected characteristic, such as race, gender, age, disability, or religion. These protections are enshrined in California’s robust anti-discrimination laws, which aim to create a fair and equitable workplace.

Breach of an implied contract can also give rise to a wrongful termination claim. Although California is an at-will state, in some cases, an implied contract may exist based on the employer’s actions, statements, or policies, which suggest that an employee will not be terminated without good cause. If an employer violates this implied contract by terminating an employee without just cause, the employee may have grounds for a wrongful termination lawsuit.

I had some issues with my employer. I called a couple of law firms. Some called back and some did not. When David Myers returned my call I found him to be down to earth and personable. He was cognitive about my issues and his knowledge of Labor Law was exemplary. My issues were addressed and handled to my satisfaction. I will recommend David Myers and his law group to anyone who asks. Thank you David.”

- Ken Fretter

The Meyers Law Group is definitely the lawyer’s you want. We got absolutely misguided by another attorney firm and Maria helped us out and got us taken care of. Maria will take the time to completely understand your case and her knowledge is well beyond the many firms we sat with.Do not! I repeat, Do not! Use another firm without talking to The Meyers Law Group first.Thank you Maria for getting us the results we were expecting."

- Koa G.

I have hired David Myers for 2 cases. The first was a wrongful termination based on my request for a reasonable accommodation under ADA law. The second case involved an employer who reneged on a written job offer/acceptance. In both cases, David was knowledgeable about the laws, presented the case well, and was supportive of me. We prevailed on both cases. I would recommend David without hesitation."

- Anonymous

California’s Non-Compete Agreements: A Unique Landscape

Non-compete agreements are contractual clauses that restrict an employee’s ability to work for a competitor or start a competing business for a certain period after leaving their current employer. These agreements are common in many states across the United States; however, California has taken a distinct approach to non-compete agreements, largely rendering them unenforceable.

California’s stance on non-compete agreements is rooted in the state’s public policy favoring open competition and employee mobility. The primary statute governing non-compete agreements in California is Section 16600 of the California Business and Professions Code, which states that “every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void.” This means that, with very few exceptions, non-compete agreements are unenforceable in California.

The rationale behind this law is that non-compete agreements stifle innovation and economic growth by restricting employees’ ability to pursue new opportunities. California’s courts have consistently upheld the principle that individuals should be free to work in their chosen field without undue restrictions. As a result, most non-compete agreements in California are deemed void and unenforceable, regardless of whether the employee signed the agreement.

However, there are limited exceptions to this general rule. Non-compete agreements may be enforceable in the context of the sale of a business, where the agreement is necessary to protect the value of the business being sold. Additionally, non-solicitation agreements, which prevent a former employee from soliciting the employer’s clients or employees, may be enforceable in certain circumstances, though they are subject to strict scrutiny.

The Intersection of Wrongful Termination and Non-Compete Agreements

Given California’s unique approach to non-compete agreements, the intersection between wrongful termination and non-compete agreements presents a distinct set of legal challenges. While non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable, employers may still attempt to impose them on employees as a condition of employment or as part of a severance package. In some cases, the inclusion of a non-compete agreement in an employment contract can contribute to a wrongful termination claim.

For instance, if an employer attempts to enforce a non-compete agreement against an employee who has been wrongfully terminated, the employee may have additional grounds to challenge the termination. The wrongful termination itself may be based on discriminatory practices or a violation of public policy, and the attempt to enforce an unenforceable non-compete agreement could be viewed as an additional violation of the employee’s rights.

Moreover, employers who wrongfully terminate an employee and subsequently seek to enforce a non-compete agreement may face legal consequences, including potential liability for wrongful termination damages. This scenario highlights the importance of understanding both wrongful termination and non-compete agreement laws in California, as employers must navigate these complex issues carefully to avoid costly legal disputes.

Employees, on the other hand, should be aware of their rights in the face of wrongful termination and the potential impact of non-compete agreements. Even if an employer includes a non-compete clause in an employment contract, employees should understand that such clauses are generally unenforceable in California. If an employee believes they have been wrongfully terminated and are being subjected to an unenforceable non-compete agreement, they may have grounds to file a lawsuit against their former employer.

Related Videos

Challenging Non-Compete Agreements After Wrongful Termination

Employees who have been wrongfully terminated and are facing the enforcement of a non-compete agreement have several legal avenues to challenge the agreement. First and foremost, employees can argue that the non-compete agreement is unenforceable under California law, citing Section 16600 of the California Business and Professions Code. Given the strong public policy against non-compete agreements in California, courts are likely to side with the employee in such cases.

Additionally, employees can challenge the non-compete agreement on the grounds that it is overly broad or unreasonable in scope. While this argument is more commonly used in states where non-compete agreements are enforceable, it may still be relevant in California if the agreement is particularly egregious. For example, if a non-compete agreement attempts to restrict an employee from working in an entire industry or geographic region, the court may find the agreement to be unenforceable due to its overreach.

Another potential challenge to a non-compete agreement is based on the circumstances surrounding the employee’s termination. If the employee was wrongfully terminated, they may argue that the non-compete agreement is void due to the employer’s breach of contract or violation of public policy. This argument can be particularly powerful if the wrongful termination involved discriminatory practices or retaliation for the employee’s exercise of protected rights.

Employees may also seek to negotiate a settlement with their former employer, particularly if the non-compete agreement is part of a severance package. In some cases, employers may be willing to waive the non-compete agreement in exchange for a release of claims or other concessions. Employees should consult with an experienced employment attorney to explore their options and determine the best course of action in light of their specific circumstances.

Protecting Employee Rights in the Face of Wrongful Termination and Non-Compete Agreements

The legal landscape surrounding wrongful termination and non-compete agreements in California is complex, and employees must be vigilant in protecting their rights. Given the strong public policy in favor of employee mobility and open competition, employees should not feel pressured to accept non-compete agreements that are unenforceable under California law. If an employer attempts to enforce a non-compete agreement after a wrongful termination, employees should seek legal counsel to explore their options and protect their interests.

Moreover, employees should be aware of the broader implications of non-compete agreements and wrongful termination. Even if a non-compete agreement is unenforceable, the mere threat of enforcement can have a chilling effect on an employee’s ability to seek new employment or start a business. Employees who believe they have been wrongfully terminated and are facing an unenforceable non-compete agreement should not hesitate to challenge the agreement and assert their rights.

Employers, too, must be cautious in their approach to non-compete agreements and termination decisions. The potential for wrongful termination claims, combined with California’s stringent rules on non-compete agreements, creates a legal environment where employers must tread carefully. Employers should ensure that any termination decisions are based on legitimate business reasons and are not influenced by discriminatory practices or violations of public policy. Additionally, employers should avoid including non-compete agreements in employment contracts unless they fall within the narrow exceptions recognized by California law.

Wrongful termination and non-compete agreements represent two critical areas of employment law in California that often intersect in complex ways. Understanding the legal principles governing these issues is essential for both employers and employees. Employees who face wrongful termination and the prospect of an unenforceable non-compete agreement should seek legal advice to protect their rights and challenge any unlawful actions by their former employer. Employers, on the other hand, should be mindful of the legal risks associated with wrongful termination and non-compete agreements and take steps to ensure compliance with California law.

If you have been wrongfully terminated or are facing an unenforceable non-compete agreement, The Myers Law Group, APC is here to help. Our experienced legal team is committed to protecting your rights and ensuring that you receive the justice you deserve. Contact us today to discuss your case and explore your legal options.